Created:
24/7/2026
Last updated:
4/8/2026

What is Bloom's taxonomy?

Bloom's taxonomy is a framework that ranks learning into six cognitive levels, from remembering facts to creating something new. Most people first meet it in school, but it earns its keep at work: L&D teams use it to set clear objectives for onboarding, compliance training, and skills development, so training builds real ability instead of just recall.

The six levels of Bloom's taxonomy

The taxonomy describes a ladder of cognitive skills. Each level builds on the one below it:

  1. Remember: recall facts, terms, and procedures, like naming the steps in your safety routine.
  2. Understand: explain ideas in your own words, like summarizing why a policy exists.
  3. Apply: use knowledge in a real situation, like following the routine on the job.
  4. Analyze: break information down and see connections, like spotting why an incident happened.
  5. Evaluate: make justified judgments, like deciding which supplier meets your requirements.
  6. Create: produce something new, like designing an improved process for your team.

Bloom's taxonomy at work: an example

Say you are training your sales team on a new product. At the lower levels, they memorize specs and explain the value proposition. Higher up, they apply the knowledge in demos, analyze customer needs, evaluate which package fits, and eventually create their own pitches. If your training stops at remembering, performance stops there too.

Bloom's taxonomy in practice for L&D teams

The taxonomy is one of the most practical tools in instructional design. Use its verbs to write learning objectives that describe what participants should be able to do, not just know. It also helps you match assessment to ambition: a quiz checks the lower levels, while scenarios and projects test the higher ones. Next time you plan a course, decide which level you are aiming for before you build a single slide.

FAQ: Bloom's taxonomy

What is the difference between the original and revised Bloom's taxonomy?

The original 1956 taxonomy used nouns such as knowledge, comprehension and synthesis, with evaluation at the top. The 2001 revision, led by Anderson and Krathwohl, switched to verbs (remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate, create) and placed create at the top. The revision is what most L&D teams use today, because verbs translate directly into learning objectives and observable behaviour.

What are common mistakes when using Bloom's taxonomy in workplace training?

Three mistakes come up repeatedly: treating the taxonomy as a rigid ladder where everyone must climb every level, using vague verbs like understand or know in objectives instead of observable ones, and testing at the wrong level, for example checking application skills with a multiple-choice quiz. Use the taxonomy as a design aid: pick the level the job requires, then match content and assessment to it.

Does every training program need to reach the create level?

No. The right target level depends on what the job requires. Compliance training often stops at apply: employees need to follow the correct procedure, not invent a new one. Leadership development, on the other hand, should reach evaluate and create. Aiming too high wastes effort, aiming too low leaves people unprepared, so decide the level per objective before you design content or assessments.

In this post

Other glossary terms

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Filter

Reset
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.